Member-only story

An Argument Against Assisted Dying

Howard Powell

·13.8k Followers· Follow

Published in Euthanasia And The Ethics Of A Doctor S Decisions: An Argument Against Assisted Dying

5 min read · 1 month before

889 View Claps

67 Respond

Save

Listen

Assisted dying, also known as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, has emerged as a polarizing issue in contemporary society. This practice involves intentionally ending a person's life at their request when they are suffering from a terminal illness or other severe, debilitating condition. While proponents argue that it provides a dignified death and promotes patient autonomy, there are substantial ethical, legal, and medical concerns that necessitate a critical examination of assisted dying. This article presents a comprehensive argument against this practice, highlighting its potential risks and consequences.

The Sanctity of Life

One of the primary objections to assisted dying is that it undermines the fundamental principle of the sanctity of life. All human beings possess inherent dignity and worth, regardless of their physical or mental condition. Intentionally ending a person's life, even at their request, violates this principle and sends a dangerous message that some lives are more valuable than others. The legalization of assisted dying creates a slippery slope, where the criteria for eligibility may gradually expand, leading to the devaluation of life in general.

Euthanasia and the Ethics of a Doctor’s Decisions: An Argument Against Assisted Dying

5 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1016 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	224 pages

The Role of Medicine

The medical profession has a primary ethical obligation to preserve life and alleviate suffering. Assisted dying directly contradicts this principle by intentionally causing death. The role of physicians should be focused on providing compassionate end-of-life care, including pain management, symptom control, and emotional support. By offering assisted dying, doctors would be complicit in ending a patient's life, which goes against the very core of their profession.

Patient Autonomy

Proponents of assisted dying often argue that it respects patient autonomy and allows individuals to make informed decisions about their own end of life. However, the concept of autonomy is complex and must be balanced against other ethical considerations. When a person is facing a terminal illness or severe suffering, their judgment may be impaired by pain, fear, or depression. It is crucial to ensure that assisted dying is not pursued out of desperation or undue pressure from others.

Safeguards and Regulation

Even if assisted dying were to be legalized, implementing effective safeguards and regulations would be extremely challenging. There is a risk of abuse and coercion, where vulnerable individuals may be pressured into ending their lives. Defining eligibility criteria would be complex and subjective, leading to potential discrimination or arbitrary decisions. Additionally, the possibility of mistakes or errors during the assisted dying process raises serious concerns about patient safety.

Compassionate End-of-Life Care

Instead of embracing assisted dying, we should invest in and prioritize compassionate end-of-life care. This involves providing comprehensive medical, emotional, and spiritual support to individuals facing terminal illness or severe suffering. Palliative care, hospice care, and other specialized services can effectively manage pain and symptoms, improve quality of life, and provide dignity to patients and their families. By focusing on compassionate care, we can ensure that people's end-of-life experiences are peaceful, meaningful, and free from unnecessary suffering.

Assisted dying is a deeply problematic practice that undermines the sanctity of life, violates medical ethics, and poses significant risks to patient welfare. The slippery slope argument, concerns about patient autonomy, and the challenges of regulation all raise serious objections to its legalization. Instead of pursuing assisted dying, we should invest in compassionate end-of-life care that respects human dignity, alleviates suffering, and provides a meaningful to life's journey. By embracing a values-based approach that places priority on life, compassion, and care, we can create a society that truly supports and honors all individuals, even in their most vulnerable moments.

Euthanasia and the Ethics of a Doctor’s Decisions: An Argument Against Assisted Dying

5 out of 5